I'm not asking for double blind control studies. I'm just asking anything to provide evidence. Well rounded arguments with lots of accurate and well thought ou

I'm not asking for double blind control studies. I'm just asking anything to provide evidence. Well rounded arguments with lots of accurate and well thought out examples (i.e. statistics, objective trends, etc) maybe books or theories supported by certain segments of the social sciences, etc. Same goes for your statement: > our current climate of discourse doesn't enable a true honest dialog* we are edging close to no other choice. (censorhip) Can you please tell me why this time it is so different than say the election between Grover Cleveland and James G. Blaine? I'm truly interested in hearing the concrete reasons for censorship being the 'no other choice' option. Again, not saying anyone is wrong, just interested to hear how much of what is stated is based on subjective truth vs objective truths.