4 ms·
I don't think that companies should be held responsible for crimes committed using their products. Why not directly punish the person who committed the crime?
by agota 7y ago
I don't think that companies should be held responsible for crimes committed using their products.
Why not directly punish the person who committed the crime?
- matthewowen 7y agoBecause it's easier to punish the people who enable it.
- agota 7y agoI don't understand why you see companies packaging their products as enabling littering. If a company produces a product, and then someone uses that product to commit a crime, did the company enable the criminal? Do you apply this reasoning to any other crimes?