3 ms·
Per capita doesn't matter for cameras, you care about per area and arguably, coverage/holes, since 10 cameras pointing at one location/direction is (often) less
by asah 7y ago
Per capita doesn't matter for cameras, you care about per area and arguably, coverage/holes, since 10 cameras pointing at one location/direction is (often) less informative than one well placed camera.
Indoors also matters a lot.
To this end, I'm really surprised that NYC doesn't make the list, given 9/11.
- guerrilla 7y ago> per capita doesn't matter for cameras You mean it may not matter. In practice, it is probably proportional to cameras per area, so it would matter.
- sieabahlpark 7y agoAs he said you can have 10 cameras pointing at one thing and know less information than one good placement... If indoor cameras count in this statistic then that throws off what is being watched, the people or the property for insurance purposes.
- guerrilla 7y ago> As he said you can have As I said, that's why it may matter, not why it does.
- bilbo0s 7y agoBut what if so many cities have blanket "coverage", that you can't really differentiate. I mean, what if there is not enough separation between cities by that metric to make a meaningful list? I'd bet that not only the large cities, but the small cities as well would have almost blanket coverage. Small places like Key West, DC, Miami Beach, etc would all tie with the big cities for 1st. Just because the percentage of city blocks covered is so high in lots of places like that.