4 ms·
I'm not really sure what you are talking about. An advertisement of what? Ultra wide lenses? The author is a photographer who writes about being excited to now
by pavelrub 7y ago
I'm not really sure what you are talking about. An advertisement of what? Ultra wide lenses? The author is a photographer who writes about being excited to now have the ability to carry an ultra wide lense - something that has exited in the photography world for decades - as part of his phone. He then write a review about the performance of this lense. Nothing about this is even close to being an advertisement.
- CapmCrackaWaka 7y agoSure, and that commercial for Amoxaperacilin I just saw on TV was just a happy family running through a field on a sunny day, with sweet music in the background while they listed off a series of horrific side effects. It wasn't an advertisement either.
- pavelrub 7y agoWhat a ridiculous non-argument. What about your advertisement is even remotely similar to the context of the above quote from an iPhone 11 camera review? Pretty much nothing.
- saiya-jin 7y agoTo use a word review, I expect at least an attempt to be objective. The article doesn't feel that way at all, even more if you actually shoot at least as a hobby, ie with some APS-C or fullframe. Discussing whether he is just subjectively biased towards Apple or outright paid is already kind of moot point
- scott_s 7y agoReviews are never "objective." They are always a single person's experience with a thing.
- baddox 7y agoWhy would you want a camera review to be “objective?” What would that even mean? Other than some tech specs (which the article does provide), there’s not a whole lot of relevant “objective” information about a camera.