3 ms·
Nobody's mentioned any tech solutions here. First of all, the Wayback machine may have captured the thieving site as well as the victim one. Of course, if you
by imglorp 7y ago
Nobody's mentioned any tech solutions here.
First of all, the Wayback machine may have captured the thieving site as well as the victim one. Of course, if you are going to make false copyright claims, you'd better set your robots.txt to exclude archive.org first.
Second, if you do manage to dispute and get a day in court, how would the thief prov they owned the material, if the actual content creator had proof of the date of authorship? Eg tweet a hash, photograph with newspaper headline, etc? Can court costs be recovered after proof of a false takedown?
- namibj 7y agoThis looks like criminal fraud, but ianal...