4 ms·
I feel like a lot of commenters on here must first be hearing of this or have not even looked into the tic-tac case even a small amount. You have a top gun pi
by erik_landerholm 7y ago
I feel like a lot of commenters on here must first be hearing of this or have not even looked into the tic-tac case even a small amount.
You have a top gun pilot and his WSO on record saying they saw it visually along with a huge underwater craft. It moved in ways that nothing using conventional propulsion can. Hovering for example is extremely difficult, made all the harder with no wings, blades or visible exhaust.
Long form interview:
Part1: https://youtu.be/3L-XG1F_S7I https://youtu.be/3L-XG1F_S7I
Part2: https://youtu.be/f7XJD_54aNk https://youtu.be/f7XJD_54aNk
There are about 20+ interviews with him on cnn, Fox News, Boston herald, ny times, etc and he will be on joe Rogan soon.
I get the objections to the FLIR video or radar pings, but if you think it’s a new jet or misdirection you have to say he and his WSO and many others are liars or confused by our own tech. Our own tech means we have something well beyond standard jet engines and fighter jet tech.
There are plenty more videos with even more details like the tic tacs (there were many of them on radar) moving 20000+ mph, dropping in from 80000ft to close to the deck. The details of the carrier fleet redirecting the jets to the position of the tic-tac is very interesting as it wasn’t at their training position...until it showed up their later. The FLIR video is from another pilot who went after it, after captain fravor landed.
- tclancy 7y ago>he will be on joe Rogan soon. Well, shut my mouth.
- erik_landerholm 7y agoI meant, it will be a 3 hr interview, instead of 45 minutes or 2 minute sounds bytes, so it will probably cover all the parts of the story, as there are more than I wrote about. I wasn’t saying that Rogan is some kind of badge of legitimacy.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- ip26 7y agoI probably just didn't understand the HUD but to me the tic-tac video I saw behaved a lot like dust in my camera lens. It seemed almost perfectly stationary within the field of view, and that kind of artifact will of course "travel" at impossible speeds and accelerate in impossible ways.
- luxuryballs 7y agoCould be some technology being tested to fake out both pilots and sensors, like a mirage/decoy? Allowing real planes to escape or stealthier craft to not get attention.
- zorronimous 7y agoOne witness noted that if people thougt he was simply insane he should not be the one to turn the key for the nuclear missile. Or worse, if his sanity was ever so slightly in doubt he should be removed - according to himself.
- Isinlor 7y agoExtraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. If there is even slight doubt about credibility of a claim of extraterrestrial technology, then there is no extraordinary evidence. Again, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Don't waste people time.
- godelski 7y agoLess than 2 minutes into the video the pilot even notes that the object is trying to jam their radar. I'm not sure why this isn't huge evidence. Which is harder to believe: the object did in fact jam their radar and mess with their sensors or aliens? 4 minutes in they are talking about how strange it is that the pilot was asked what ordinance he had on board. THEN he is given chase orders... I'm going with Occam's Razor here.