3 ms·
I don't understand your criticism. If the TV were given close to free and then subsidized by ads, sure. But I'm paying >$500 for the TV, why should I get ads to
by c13u 7y ago
I don't understand your criticism. If the TV were given close to free and then subsidized by ads, sure. But I'm paying >$500 for the TV, why should I get ads too?
- U8dcN7vx 7y agoBecause they can. Alternatively, perhaps it would be more like >$2000 to avoid the advertising.
- TeMPOraL 7y agoOr it would be $500 and no advertising. Them doing ads doesn't mean they can't survive without them, it just means they like the extra money.
- diminoten 7y agoMy criticism is the vast overvaluing of information value, and the complete failure to accurately assess the risk of that information becoming public.