3 ms·
I agree that would have prevented a lot of misunderstandings but Navy operates this way all the time. They prefer a somewhat "blinded" subject.
by therein 7y ago
I agree that would have prevented a lot of misunderstandings but Navy operates this way all the time. They prefer a somewhat "blinded" subject.
- lamontcg 7y agoOr someone just screwed up the human side of it.
- ALittleLight 7y agoThe subject would still be blinded though. You could tell them after the fact. Then you get the real experience of a pilot encountering your system plus you get the added benefit that they won't tell people about the "UFO" they saw.
- hinkley 7y agoBut what about the next experiment? How are you going to keep the other pilots from figuring out they're test subjects? Especially if any word about the experiment got out. Swearing another pilot to secrecy versus letting them think you're nuts for the rest of your lives, I think they're gonna pick door #1.
- maxharris 7y agoIsn't that a bit paranoid?
- thelittleone 7y agoSay this was some new aircraft or FLIR spoofing secret test and the US knows that (insert adversary country) intelligence is aware of the program. How would seeing this video affect the adversary? I guess what I'm saying is (whether real or fake) this could be a controlled leak for strategic benefit.
- typeformer 7y agoI think you know nothing about the Navy