4 ms·
~same topic now: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21008930 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21008930 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21008988 ht
by NGC404 7y ago
~same topic
now:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21008930 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21008930
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21008988 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21008988
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20997012 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20997012
older:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19828448 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19828448
- wildrhythms 7y agoWould just like to piggyback on this to say that the wording of what is "real" is very specific: >[the Navy] designates the objects contained in these videos as unidentified aerial phenomena. That is to say, the videos are "real" in that the source is genuine (captured by the U.S. Navy and not a doctored hoax), but the Navy is not making any other statement on what appears in the video.
- ak217 7y agoYou missed the most sane thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20018535 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20018535 and in particular https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20019375 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20019375.
- PenguinCoder 7y agoNGC as on, Northrop Grumman ? (404) not found@