I am quite honestly happy to accept that you're not playing word games and that your intent with trying to dive into this language is good. I do not believe th

I am quite honestly happy to accept that you're not playing word games and that your intent with trying to dive into this language is good. I do not believe the same is true of stallman, after having watched him redefine terms for decades, offer his own set of meaning for jargon in common use elsewhere, and so on. I think his frequent stance of "we must examine what this means" is more often than not a distraction, because sometimes he takes a technical meaning, sometimes he substitutes his own, and it never seems like his goal is a shared understanding; just that we should accept his.