They're listening on a really noise channel. It seems premature to talk about the frequency of the detected events matching some expected rate when they keep tu

They're listening on a really noise channel. It seems premature to talk about the frequency of the detected events matching some expected rate when they keep tuning their filters to the expectations. I recently read an article deploring the missing confirmation of the mergers through light-based astronomy. I can't find the article now, so I'm just going to list another one: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24032022-600-exclusive-grave-doubts-over-ligos-discovery-of-gravitational-waves/ https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24032022-600-exclusiv... Has anything changed from what is described in the article?