>In summary, your thread rapidly devolved into a political flame war, I am sorry to have ever engaged with you, and I am done now. Wow, if you regret engaging

>In summary, your thread rapidly devolved into a political flame war, I am sorry to have ever engaged with you, and I am done now. Wow, if you regret engaging why the heck do you have to engage again then run away with your tail between your legs. >Straw man. I made it clear that this act is definitive of the USA just as Chinese government's present day actions are definitive of it. If this action defines you then you need to be executed. Literally for the murder of thousands. It's a war crime. Be glad it doesn't define the country or you. >Undefended baseless hyperbolic claim. Like your entire argument. >You have defined freedom of speech in a way that merely assists your argument. No one should expect the freedom you describe. I have defined it the way it's defined in english. If no one expects the freedom then there is no freedom in the first place. Your definition of freedom is a very specific subset, exacting and detailed, while mine is literally the dictionary definition of freedom and speech. >Straw man. No one has accused you of this. You literally said that I'm spreading propaganda rather than my opinions as if I'm trying to deliberately manipulate. Governments usually do this hence it's assumed that's what you implied. Either way, if anything your insidious response is probably what caused this whole thread to devolve into a flame war. You aren't done. You never will be. I'm the one done with you, permanently. Stop using the term strawman when your entire argument is a strawman.