3 ms·
True, but consider that they're equally productive for any discourse, that is to say a net negative. Therefore it would be pertinent to treat them similarly.
by SimbaOnSteroids 7y ago
True, but consider that they're equally productive for any discourse, that is to say a net negative. Therefore it would be pertinent to treat them similarly.
- bllguo 7y agowhat kind of "discourse" are you aiming for after you've labeled and dismissed everyone with a pro-China sentiment? a debate where the only participants have the same opinions seems like the least productive possible form of discussion.
- mullingitover 7y ago"everyone with a pro-China sentiment" != one sock puppet account with zero history aside from spouting rhetoric on one position.
- vkou 7y agoWhat makes you think it's a sock puppet, and not someone who wants to express a political opinion, without having it tied back to their main account? It would be a sock puppet if one person had multiple accounts for this purpose.
- SimbaOnSteroids 7y agoWould you debate a Scientologist on the merits of Scientology?
- bllguo 7y ago...of course? Who else would you even be debating with? What is there to discuss between two people who hate scientology? Isn't the point of debate to entertain different views and/or to persuade others?