> I think it makes sense to limit how much impact one large state can have on the whole country. You mean, much like Europe has had an impact on the whole worl

> I think it makes sense to limit how much impact one large state can have on the whole country. You mean, much like Europe has had an impact on the whole world by introducing GDPR? Borders are no more when the issues are global. Privacy, health, wellbeing, … When a group of people decides that something has an impact on their lives (health in this case, or anything else for that matter), and introduce regulation because the industry doesn't give enough fucks, what's so bad about it?