Obviously not every detail is included here but I did find it odd that, although he mentions a focus on outcomes, the change he talks about is entirely about sh

Obviously not every detail is included here but I did find it odd that, although he mentions a focus on outcomes, the change he talks about is entirely about shifting from one process to another, both of which by themselves might be pretty arbitrary. > reviews would be about frequent delivery, incremental development and how leadership could remove obstacle I would think that in a Lean process that outcomes and therefore reports would be focused on performance of North Star Metrics, KPIs, comparing those against goals, analytics/research to help understand that performance, and hypotheses/strategies for how to improve. I'm a big fan of Lean/BML approach and I'm assuming this is what is happening but the article doesn't really send that message. Because of that omission, after reading but before seeing the author my first thought was this was consultant blather.