3 ms·
It's trash because people are dumb and it encourages them to store all of their state globally.
by viklove 7y ago
It's trash because people are dumb and it encourages them to store all of their state globally.
- nobleach 7y agoI'm pretty sure that is discouraged by the docs and the author. Just because a library doesn't pop up a bouncing anthropomorphic paperclip and specifically ASK you, "are you sure you want to store this state globally?", doesn't mean the library is bad. Just think of the brain-dead things the C language allows you to do with malloc! Yet that's not at all C's fault.
- viklove 7y agoIt might not be Redux's fault, but the result of Redux being a popular library is that many projects have all of their state stored globally. This would not be the case if Redux didn't exist. Call me consequentialist, but I think Redux has to share some of the blame.