4 ms·
If all use Amazon or Google to stream then there is not that much extra expense. IMO I prefer to buy a game from the developer and get it cheaper or give the m
by simion314 7y ago
If all use Amazon or Google to stream then there is not that much extra expense.
IMO I prefer to buy a game from the developer and get it cheaper or give the money to the creator but this days most games are on stores and not on the dev website, a good example is Minecraft ,it would probably be more expensive if it would have been on Steam and I would have to install the Steam client to play the game, and I could not play game A on my PC and my son to play game B on his PC, I am forced to use the trick of getting into offline mode.
- thedaemon 7y agoSteam has sales all of the time, it's the Amazon of games, and it will always be cheaper on a Steam sale than the developers website.
- simion314 7y agoDevelopers could have discounts when the game gets older. My point is that in some cases Steam or Apple taking 30% is too much, now that Steam has some competition they made some deals with big publisher but this big percentage are to large for some products. In this debate though many people ignore the creators and feel entitled that the app,game or movie be on his preferred store and using his preferred payment method. I am sure there are cases where the store works great too.
- FussyZeus 7y agoWell Minecraft always had it's own launcher since it left beta. I think they've mostly just kept the same system for the Java version because it's what people are used to, and there's a huge community around modding it. There is a version of Minecraft on the Microsoft Store but it's not nearly as popular.