2 ms·
FLOPs is probably not a very sensible measure for measuring hardware from 1985, nothing had FPUs back then. Novix claimed that it achieved 10 MIPS at 7.5Mhz dr
by opencl 7y ago
FLOPs is probably not a very sensible measure for measuring hardware from 1985, nothing had FPUs back then.
Novix claimed that it achieved 10 MIPS at 7.5Mhz drawing about 0.35W. Kind of hard to verify how accurate their claims were with the chips being impossible to find though.
Also from 1985, a 20Mhz MC68HC000 drew 0.38W[2] for 3.5 MIPS (going by 0.175 MIPS/Mhz[3]).
So if you believe Novix's claims it had really good power efficiency for the time.
[1] https://en.wikichip.org/w/images/a/a6/nc4016.pdf https://en.wikichip.org/w/images/a/a6/nc4016.pdf
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorola_68000 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorola_68000
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instructions_per_second https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instructions_per_second
- abecedarius 7y agoAs I remember it they claimed much faster interrupt handling too -- I don't remember the details. Something like only having to save a couple of hardware registers.
- mud_dauber 7y agoExactly. Task switching was (if memory serves - no pun intended) no more than 3-4 references.
- kjs3 7y agoFLOPs is probably not a very sensible measure for measuring hardware from 1985, nothing had FPUs back then. Umm...the Intel 8087 was '80 or '81, and it was AFAIK the most popular PC upgrade after memory. The 68881 was '84. My NS32081s have '84 datecodes but came out earlier. The Am9511/C8231 were mid to late 70s and all over the 8-bitters. Weitek had 3rd party solutions for 68k, x86 and lots of others in this timeframe, and MMI was pitching the 74S516 for the 68k early 80s. Almost everything had an FPU option in 1985.