The article does seem to operate on the premise that they aren't doing this. Until now, I assumed the point was to divest from fossil fuels and reinvest in grow

The article does seem to operate on the premise that they aren't doing this. Until now, I assumed the point was to divest from fossil fuels and reinvest in growth industries: renewables and sustainable production. But maybe they aren't. The article might have a flawed premise, or maybe it's a call to action for organizations that are divesting to invest in the future. I only skimmed the article, so I don't know if they explored this. At a glance, I see no mention of where the money went after they pulled it out of fossil fuels.