4 ms·
His fight for free software is a part of his character. he was doing it for all these years with high motivation because it wasn't just idealistic, it was perso
by dvfjsdhgfv 7y ago
His fight for free software is a part of his character. he was doing it for all these years with high motivation because it wasn't just idealistic, it was personal. A specific brand of proprietary software made his happy hippie coding youth end, took away his friends, etc. - you probably heard the story a million times. Most people would just give up and go on, but he decided to choose Don Quixote's way.
Nobody believed he would succeed, it was a lost fight by a lunatic. But it was this weird obsession that kept him motivated over the years. The appearance of Linux was both a success (the world finally got a complete operating system) and a failure (it forgot about GNU and focused on Linux). Then it turned out that proprietary software is not the only danger coming from greedy corporations: DRM, vendor lock-in, etc. RMS predicted many of these and was actively fighting against them. Whereas on a personal level he was the same Don Quixote as in the after-Symbolics period. Many people hated him for all possible reasons, and are celebrating now. What a sad time.
- eesmith 7y agoWhich has nothing to do with this specific thread topic, that being evidence of "decades of Stallman's abuse of his positions at FSF and MIT".