Future generations having rights is a weird concept. If we cut science spending, can someone sue on behalf of future generations that they are being deprived of

Future generations having rights is a weird concept. If we cut science spending, can someone sue on behalf of future generations that they are being deprived of a better world. Is advocating for negative population growth a hate crime against future generations since you are trying to ensure fewer will be born? The real issue with climate change is that it is not electorally popular to do anything other than a few token gestures. The increased gas taxes contributed to the yellow vest protests in France. The Australian election upset was also spurred by concern that one of the parties would try to cut fossil fuels. I do not know that trying to do an end around the electorate and appealing to the judiciary on a novel legal theory is going to work in the long term.