Friendship also requires the consent of two. I don't stop thinking at "consent" and "into it", and I don't have to justify that to you, either. I could elaborat

Friendship also requires the consent of two. I don't stop thinking at "consent" and "into it", and I don't have to justify that to you, either. I could elaborate, but you're not really asking, or respecting my opinion at all -- me just "being into" certain people as friends apparently isn't enough for you. > This agist view towards sex that you are prescribing You're actually trying to prescribe to something to me, and about my reasoning and "view" you know nothing, because you prefer your own straw man. > is certainly no better than someone who would stop being friends with someone because they found out that their friend is gay. Aaaand here comes the payoff, where being against taking advantage of someone is "the" bad thing, and dirty old men don't exist, just an "agist view". A lot of variations can be seen in that other thread, too: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20990583 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20990583