4 ms·
Author of the post here. The r/netsec community brings up good points. One thing that's come up frequently is the question of trademark disputes. Handshake does
by troquerre 7y ago
Author of the post here. The r/netsec community brings up good points. One thing that's come up frequently is the question of trademark disputes. Handshake does have mechanisms in place to protect a good number of existing trademarks (only the domain owners of the top 100k Alexa domains can register their names as TLDs), and it also has mechanisms to prevent early squatting through the 52 week period for name rollouts.
These mechanics protect trademarks in the short term, but in the long term anyone can bid on an unregistered name in the open auction system that Handshake created. My perspective on this is that there isn't an inherent reason why a naming system needs to deal with trademark issues — there are pros and cons to names being registered in an open auction, just like there are pros and cons to Bitcoin being a store of value that's difficult to censor and seize.
- ocdtrekkie 7y agoThere are very good public safety reasons to allow lifting domains from their current owners. Like if someone owns Microsift and puts a phishing page on it. What about botnet C2 servers?
- xur17 7y agoThis doesn't completely solve the problem, but the top 100k domains on Alexa will be reserved for those domain owners (ex microsoft.com can claim microsoft, google.com Google, etc).