2 ms·
But isn't it less biased to dump it all? With the only reason for not releasing being risk to arguably ~innocent individuals. Also, it's relevant to note that
by mirimir 7y ago
But isn't it less biased to dump it all?
With the only reason for not releasing being risk to arguably ~innocent individuals.
Also, it's relevant to note that Holocaust investigators have not redacted names of ~responsible individuals from their releases. Indeed, they've targeted them.
- mhh__ 7y agoWikileaks regularly publish credit card details of completely unrelated bystanders e.g. political donors (and I mean $15 rather than $15 million). They also clearly time their leaks for impact rather than purely apolitical time slots. Speaking of the holocaust, wikileaks also hired a holocaust denier (in the words of hopenothate) - Israel Shamim - for years
- mirimir 7y agoUmmm, I didn't mention Wikileaks, so bringing up them -- and freelancer Israel Shamim -- is whataboutism. My point about Holocaust investigators is undeniable. I mentioned it as evidence that culpability is an accepted justification for releasing information about individuals.