You are referring to this CSAIL mailing list excerpt? https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6405929-09132019142056-0001.html https://www.documentcloud.org/doc

You are referring to this CSAIL mailing list excerpt? https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6405929-09132019142056-0001.html https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6405929-091320191420... Please show me the plain words, in the email thread which I have read in its entirety, where he says a 17 year old was consenting to being trafficked. He has asserted in this thread: * that sexual assault is too broad and vague a term; we should use narrower terms to more concretely describe actions, so as not to rise to mis-impressions (this is primary idea). * that he thinks it is morally absurd to define rape based on location of occurrence. * that he thinks it is morally absurd to define rape based on a 1 year age difference. * that Minsky may not have been aware that Giuffre was being coerced (in his opinion, the most plausible scenario was that Minsky was not aware). * that Giuffre herself did not, to his knowledge, level accusations at Minsky (she implicated him in a deposition against Epstein, but did not give details). He has not (AFAICT) asserted in this thread: * that Minsky did not commit a crime. * that Minsky's actions were entirely moral. * that Epstein's actions were neither criminal nor immoral. * that a 17 year old was consenting to being trafficked.