3 ms·
There’s generally very loose discretion to eliminate potential jurors. Often without providing any reason at all. A prosecutor, given the option and knowledge
by koolba 7y ago
There’s generally very loose discretion to eliminate potential jurors. Often without providing any reason at all.
A prosecutor, given the option and knowledge of the situation, would never willingly have a person on the jury that knows they could totally disregard the criminality of the charges at hand.
- blaser-waffle 7y agoThat works for the defense as well -- they're allowed to object to jurors too, for the same reasons: potential biases, ability to see through sophistry, etc.