3 ms·
You basically proved his point. The analogy is correct but no one cares if a little guy can't buy lunch. Same problem, different scale.
by excitom 7y ago
You basically proved his point. The analogy is correct but no one cares if a little guy can't buy lunch. Same problem, different scale.
- anoncareer0212 7y agoHN comments tend to have more charity than other places online – it's unlikely I "proved his point" by answering his query regarding if it's a bad analogy :) Its not that "no one cares" about "a little guy", it's that even though I didn't eat lunch today, my colleagues did. If me skipping lunch meant my colleagues didn't have any food, someone would step in to avoid my colleagues dying