3 ms·

Sealed vs Unsealed has more nuanced definitions than just "letter"/speech and "item"/things, though. If you look a bit further past the quotes you provided, you

Sealed vs Unsealed has more nuanced definitions than just "letter"/speech and "item"/things, though. If you look a bit further past the quotes you provided, you'll see: >Sealed mail includes: First-Class Mail; Priority Mail; Priority Mail Express; Shipped packages ("things") can be (but aren't always) sent as First Class or Priority Mail, and thus would fall under the "sealed" category as well. OTOH, you can also send normal letters (not periodicals or marketing material) as "standard mail" which would make them unsealed (I don't know why you would do this as opposed to sending it as First Class or Priority, but you can). Basically, USPS provides a service where, regardless of what you are sending in most cases, you can choose whether or not you want it protected by the 4th amendment. The origins of this "choice" (and why it isn't the standard to always being protected) is where I am more confused. And when talking about parallels to electronic media, I think this is an important point, because if this is the case for physical mail, it also stands to reason that electronic media for some reason might not default to being protected by the 4th amendment, either.

mattkrause 7y ago
You're making this way more mysterious-sounding than it is. As the text says, those first categories are INTENDED for sealed letters. Things shipped in those ways therefore retain the privacy protections of letters. You can put a (small) rock or whatever in there instead--that's your business--and if you do, the Post Office will never know because they're applying the letter-privacy standard and not looking inside. The other categories are NOT INTENDED for letters. As a result, they don't get the protection intended for letters. You can, of course, try to send something confidential that way, but if it's exposed, that's on you.
- txcwpalpha 7y ago
  That simply isn't the case though. First Class Mail (and Priority Mail) are specifically intended for both "letters" as well as "things". A glance at the USPS website shows this. Indeed, even in the CFR you quoted, it specifically mentions certain types of "package" services as sealed mail. I don't know where you're getting that there is a specific "intention" for anything.
  - 4ntonius8lock 7y ago
    No, first class mail specifically is for commercial sending. It even has commercial requirements: > Standard mail must be less than 16 ounces and must meet a minimum quantity of 200 pieces or 50 pounds of mail. Your obstinacy in the face of overwhelming evidence against what you are saying is amazing. I feel for you. Life is hard when you act that way (I should know, I've fallen in those patterns at times)
  - mattkrause 7y ago
    It’s literally what the CFR says: “maintained...for the transmission of letters sealed against inspection.” The word “for” clearly means “intended for” or “for the purposes of.” You can put whatever you want in a priority mail envelope, but the size and weight limits are much more suited to a big document than an engine block.

mattkrause 7y ago

You're making this way more mysterious-sounding than it is. As the text says, those first categories are INTENDED for sealed letters. Things shipped in those ways therefore retain the privacy protections of letters. You can put a (small) rock or whatever in there instead--that's your business--and if you do, the Post Office will never know because they're applying the letter-privacy standard and not looking inside. The other categories are NOT INTENDED for letters. As a result, they don't get the protection intended for letters. You can, of course, try to send something confidential that way, but if it's exposed, that's on you.

txcwpalpha 7y ago
That simply isn't the case though. First Class Mail (and Priority Mail) are specifically intended for both "letters" as well as "things". A glance at the USPS website shows this. Indeed, even in the CFR you quoted, it specifically mentions certain types of "package" services as sealed mail. I don't know where you're getting that there is a specific "intention" for anything.
- 4ntonius8lock 7y ago
  No, first class mail specifically is for commercial sending. It even has commercial requirements: > Standard mail must be less than 16 ounces and must meet a minimum quantity of 200 pieces or 50 pounds of mail. Your obstinacy in the face of overwhelming evidence against what you are saying is amazing. I feel for you. Life is hard when you act that way (I should know, I've fallen in those patterns at times)
- mattkrause 7y ago
  It’s literally what the CFR says: “maintained...for the transmission of letters sealed against inspection.” The word “for” clearly means “intended for” or “for the purposes of.” You can put whatever you want in a priority mail envelope, but the size and weight limits are much more suited to a big document than an engine block.