3 ms·
This has almost always been the case. The government is a huge part of the economy and risk-free debt is a huge part of liquidity. It is boring but stuff like t
by hogFeast 7y ago
This has almost always been the case. The government is a huge part of the economy and risk-free debt is a huge part of liquidity. It is boring but stuff like the timing of payments matters. Paying taxes is a big, lumpy issue...and the reason the Fed came into existence was because of big, lump payments relating to the crop cycle (i.e. money becoming tight every year as banks lent to farmers...iirc). And before the 1980s (maybe the 70s), liquidity was the primary concern of policy-makers (you can go through FED minutes in the 1960s from ALFRED, the main policy tool was free funds).
What happened is nothing to do with the level of rates. It is to do with the volume (and often the location) of liquidity (location because tax payments just go on deposit somewhere else, but it still causes a dislocation).
- rolltiide 7y agoPeople just don't like how resources are appropriated as they are subject to a different work mechanism in exchange for resources and not everyone else is. These headlines are mainly to trigger that sentiment.
- rhizome 7y agoI dunno, a lot of the mechanisms mentioned in thread sound pretty socialistic, and at any rate dispenses with advocacy for free markets fairly completely. Maybe it's time for the system to admit this, it can't be worse than universal health care.