3 ms·
It really wasn't tolerable though. As much as I deeply respect Dr Stallman's work, he has a long history of reputationally troubling statements: https://stallm
by chungus_khan 7y ago
It really wasn't tolerable though. As much as I deeply respect Dr Stallman's work, he has a long history of reputationally troubling statements:
https://stallman.org/cgi-bin/showpage.cgi?path=/archives/2003-may-aug.html&term=%22another%20caveman%22&type=norm&case=0 https://stallman.org/cgi-bin/showpage.cgi?path=/archives/200...
https://www.stallman.org/archives/2006-may-aug.html#05%20June%202006%20%28Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party%29 https://www.stallman.org/archives/2006-may-aug.html#05%20Jun...
- TeMPOraL 7y agoI meant this technically: it was tolerable because it was tolerated. They could've disassociated from him after any of his troubling statements. They didn't.