4 ms·

> It does matter that RMS, in a hypothetical defended the supposed actions in the way that he did. Like... he wrote about it? Many others did, nobody lost the

> It does matter that RMS, in a hypothetical defended the supposed actions in the way that he did. Like... he wrote about it? Many others did, nobody lost the job. It must be horryfying to read someone else's opinion in 2019 America... You're talking like Stallman is some kind of new Ted Bundy... > And yes, I repeated myself many times to several people saying similar things with the intention of facing all of the threads with a similar challenge. So what? are you sure you're not simply obsessed with it?

xwolfi 7y ago
The irony is to see the SJW movement spiraling out of control. I was reading an article of Stallman's on how to name a non-gendered individual where he proposes all kind of fake pronouns and goes on and on as if it was a new fusion reactor technology he was working on. He's not Chomsky I tell you that. The thing with him is that people were just so frigging fed up and didn't know what to find to get rid of his ass. One day, he decided to write about the moral definition of rape, the next day he was out :D No need to be a Stallman-level genius to see what happened, he could finally be fired without all the frigging free software extremists yelling censorship... Stallman is now the SJW devil incarnate ahah
- lostjohnny 7y ago
  The irony is that without Stallman the SJW are just the blackshirts of fascist memory. And I'm Italian, my grandfather was a partisan, I know what I'm talking about. BTW, I am yelling, because what he said is perfectly reasonable, given the context.