4 ms·
> The problem is defending a man accused of statutory rape by saying his accuser appeared willing How is that a problem exactly? > 17 and 73 Would her being
by dependenttypes 7y ago
> The problem is defending a man accused of statutory rape by saying his accuser appeared willing
How is that a problem exactly?
> 17 and 73
Would her being a 18 prostitute change anything in your eyes? Because I am pretty sure that most 17 year olds can easily be confused with 18 year olds and the reverse.
> Defending that situation - real or hypothetical - is very problematic. It gets you fired.
In our current "cancel culture" society, agree.
- colechristensen 7y ago>Would her being a 18 prostitute change anything in your eyes? An 18 year old prostitute is extraordinarily likely to be in that situation as a result of a lifetime of abuse and desperation. Taking advantage of that for sexual pleasure, especially at the age of 73, makes you a terrible person. An old man taking advantage of a young woman is the issue. One year and tiny permutations of the details which change the legal situation do not change the moral situation that in any similar situation, the old man is a indefensible scumbag. It doesn't matter if it is a hypothetical or not, defending that old man by saying the victim would have presented herself as willing, is a big issue. Not a witch hunt, not mob rule.
- frabbit 7y agoThat is a good point. And it seems that it applies to prostitution at other ages too. But a lot of sex workers would challenge that.
- setr 7y agoThe defense was on the part of whether it should be (morally) considered rape/sexual assault, not on whether it should have taken place at all.