5 ms·
Existing discussion here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20990583 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20990583
by JBerlinsky 7y ago
Existing discussion here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20990583 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20990583
- lanevorockz 7y agoAny reason to duplicate the discussion?
- etiam 7y agoNot on this basis. Forbes parrots much of the mischaracterizations.
- r721 7y agoAlso https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20989696 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20989696 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20994245 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20994245 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20992381 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20992381
- fenomas 7y agoTo be fair, earlier submissions all got flagged off the front page fairly quickly, so later submitters may well not have known about them.