> Defending statutory rape, even hypothetically, will get you fired. IIRC Stallman did nothing of the sort. The only thing Stallman said was that the accusatio

> Defending statutory rape, even hypothetically, will get you fired. IIRC Stallman did nothing of the sort. The only thing Stallman said was that the accusations correspond to statutory rape. In fact how is Stallman supposed to have defended statutory rape if he was the one raising the accusation of statutory rape? Some random virtue signaler started making up accusations of sexual assault and Stallman chimed in stating that the description actually represented the crime of statutory rape. How is that passed off as a defense or apology?