4 ms·
You mean such as: "The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, nec
by fesoliveira 7y ago
You mean such as:
"The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution,
"prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest
and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these
acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness."
RMS on June 28th, 2003 https://stallman.org/archives/2003-mar-jun.html
--------------------------
"I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm
seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by
the idea that their little baby is maturing. "
RMS on June 5th, 2006) https://stallman.org/archives/2006-mar-jun.html#05%20June%202006%20(Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party
--------------------------
" There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children.
Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do
not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue. "
RMS on Jan 4th, 2013) https://stallman.org/archives/2013-jan-apr.html#04_January_2013_(Pedophilia
- AnIdiotOnTheNet 7y agoYes, precisely this. It's a controversial opinion, certainly that makes a lot of people uncomfortable, but it also seems to be a considered one. Notably absent from posts where people pasting these quotes is any argument against the claims made by RMS. We are apparently meant to assume he is both wrong and malevolent merely for holding an opinion we find uncomfortable.
- hdfbdtbcdg 7y agoTo be fair to RMS he has retracted this opinion and provides arguements against it himself....
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- ernst_klim 7y ago>I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children I'll just leave this here https://www.amazon.com/Trauma-Myth-Sexual-Children-Aftermath/dp/0465022111 https://www.amazon.com/Trauma-Myth-Sexual-Children-Aftermath...
- hdfbdtbcdg 7y agoI doubt anyone here is defending pedophilia. I certainly am not.
- dasKrokodil 7y ago> [...] necrophilia [...] should be legal as long as no one is coerced. I wonder how that is supposed to work. How would one acquire consent from a corpse?
- jessaustin 7y agoWho owns a corpse? If the former inhabitant of the then-living body had designated a particular heir via a will or similar legal instrument, one might acquire consent from that heir?