Just saying that the crazy content is still available so assessing the idea that speech is being limited and we are reaching a monoculture is testable against t

Just saying that the crazy content is still available so assessing the idea that speech is being limited and we are reaching a monoculture is testable against that yardstick. I'm not here to defend the quality or content of those extreme websites. Advertising money has something to do with YouTube deplatforming people which is part of evaluating the idea that we are becoming a monoculture. I think only the daily stormer is an example if you go anywhere you will be pulled down, including for. Controlling that stuff is the government's job, I would expect radical political sects to lose the fight to host a website. But if your idea is non political you're basically in the clear.