> somebody else put that person under duress, or because they were lying (under duress or otherwise) It's like benefitting from any other kind of traffic, isn'

> somebody else put that person under duress, or because they were lying (under duress or otherwise) It's like benefitting from any other kind of traffic, isn't it? If you benefit from a money laundering scheme or a fraud, you'd be charged with complicity, even if you took a lot of care into not inquiring about the provenance of the money. At least, that's how it's be judged in my country (France, and I'm not a lawyer so don't quote me on that). I can't tell for other countries.