3 ms·

I am sorry, but this is getting tedious.. > That incident was not even relevant here It is 100% relevant. > That incident was not even relevant here, it spe

I am sorry, but this is getting tedious.. > That incident was not even relevant here It is 100% relevant. > That incident was not even relevant here, it specifically did not start the name calling from either side. So where's your proof? Again, you are saying the same thing as your last, which is, I know better because I am Chinese. > You clearly know next to nothing about the situation. Ad hominem > unless you intend to misinform and mislead Accusation with no proof. Just name calling. Let's end this argument, because it clearly is going nowhere.

UIZealot 7y ago
> So where's your proof? Again, you are saying the same thing as your last, which is, I know better because I am Chinese. As compared to you who's not even close to being familiar with the situation, who managed to read a whole Wikipedia article on the subject? You bet! > Ad hominem Ooh, fancy, I don't know what that means, you win that one there, automatically! >> unless you intend to misinform and mislead >Accusation with no proof. Just name calling. Oops! Misquotation fail. You left the "unless" in there this time, which made it clear I wasn't making an accusation.