He does not really say Minsky was innocent - he insists that what Minsky did should not be called 'assault' because this term is misleading. [Update] In anothe

He does not really say Minsky was innocent - he insists that what Minsky did should not be called 'assault' because this term is misleading. [Update] In another place he does argue that it is not evident that Minsky eventually did have sex with her - from the deposition it seems that she said she was directed to do it and then the lawyer asks where she went to do that and she answers that question, but it is quite probably that she misunderstood and answered the question 'where was she directed to go to do that', and there is a witness who says that Minsky turned her down. For me this is a fair argument.