3 ms·

what's the alternative ? using an "untyped" variable ? but then you loose type checking and some people don't like to loose type checking...

• KptMarchewa 7y ago
  Do not use patterns that require you to write code like that.
  • KirinDave 7y ago
    Or use type aliases that are helpful.
  • ratww 7y ago
    That's the answer for me. The problem in those cases always the abuse of often obsolete OOP patterns and misnamed classes.
  • Thiez 7y ago
    You never have cases where you have a list of lists? Or do you introduce a pointless wrapper type for the inner lists to "hide" the generics?