4 ms·
If Apple didn't want that information to be public, they probably shouldn't have downloaded 45TB of data a day from a service they have no paid agreement with.
by semicolon_storm 7y ago
If Apple didn't want that information to be public, they probably shouldn't have downloaded 45TB of data a day from a service they have no paid agreement with.
- lvh 7y agoI don’t disagree, but that’s not responsive to my (or GPs) point. GP implied the aggregate is what made it OK: if anything that made it more sensitive (not everyone would bother to aggregate and look up who owns the IPs).