4 ms·
The full e-mail thread is at the bottom of this article, in an awfully-formatted little PDF viewer. I suggest full-screening. https://www.vice.com/en_us/articl
by azernik 7y ago
The full e-mail thread is at the bottom of this article, in an awfully-formatted little PDF viewer. I suggest full-screening.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/9ke3ke/famed-computer-scientist-richard-stallman-described-epstein-victims-as-entirely-willing https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/9ke3ke/famed-computer-sci...
- Rebelgecko 7y agoI read the full thread, and I didn't see anything that I would consider "defending rape". It seemed pretty clear that he thinks Epstein was a bad person and that what happened to Giuffre is not good. The closest thing to defending rape is him trying to give Minsky the benefit of the doubt (e.g. stating that Minksky may not have known Giuffre's age or situation, and IIRC in her deposition she was careful to avoid saying whether or not she actually had sex with Minsky, only that Epstein wanted her to).
- azernik 7y agoSee page 7, where he argues that sex with a minor should not be considered rape.
- trophycase 7y agoAre sexually mature underage people prepubescent children now? It's ridiculous that people continue to willfully conflate the two just because they want to continue to have the moral high ground.
- 2_listerine_pls 7y agoBecause it is not the definition of rape.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]