Can't find a better way to contact you: little typo, grammatical issue really. Article says: > In Pilotwings' case, a fix to one algorithm resulted in the att

Can't find a better way to contact you: little typo, grammatical issue really. Article says: > In Pilotwings' case, a fix to one algorithm resulted in the attract sequence showing a plane landing to fail, and the plane to infamously crash. That's easy to misread. I'd suggest: > In Pilotwings' case, one of these algorithms failed, so that a part of the attract sequence a plane infamously crashed rather than landing as intended. Or similar. As originally written it's easy to misunderstand what is failing.