4 ms·
Why wouldn't these two approached work in parallel ? An ad-free experience for those willing to pay and an ad supported one for those who don't. I'm sure ther
by udkl 7y ago
Why wouldn't these two approached work in parallel ?
An ad-free experience for those willing to pay and an ad supported one for those who don't.
I'm sure there are nuances like the politics you mention in your linked comment. Just curious why.
- manigandham 7y agoThey can, and some services offer both. Maintaining two systems is resource and support intensive though, especially for payments. It's rarely worth the hassle if you only get 1 in a million to subscribe directly. The cable-bundle approach to content might get more traction but there are too many competing bundles adding fatigue (just like video streaming), on top of the fact that people don't value general content the same as music or movies so the rates are inconsequential compared to ads.
- satyrnein 7y agoCompanies don't want to advertise to the people with no money.
- udkl 7y agoThat's an astute observation, however I doubt it's valid. Not paying a monthly subscription wouldn't indicate poverty. It might just be these people are subscription averse... or they are used to ad supported free content and don't want to pay...