4 ms·
That’d reduce rural voting strength from ridiculously outsized to a bit less outsized making influencing our politicians a lot more expensive. It’d be great fo
by codyb 7y ago
That’d reduce rural voting strength from ridiculously outsized to a bit less outsized making influencing our politicians a lot more expensive.
It’d be great for the vast majority of Americans but is probably unlikely to happen because the people spending the most money will convince the primarily poor and less well educated rural populace that they’ll be giving up their votes and it’ll diminish their power despite an almost universal lack of satisfaction with our Congress among Americans of all shades and stripes.