That's a pretty unhelpfully polarizing statement for something that is a matter of opinion, or at least situational. Suppose you are a citizen of a country (th

That's a pretty unhelpfully polarizing statement for something that is a matter of opinion, or at least situational. Suppose you are a citizen of a country (through no choice of your own) that uses public taxes to <immoral action>. Further suppose that you have no ability to influence how your taxes are spent. You have to pay taxes, but it's not at all clear that you are morally complicit for the immoral actions taken with them. You could argue "well you shouldn't pay taxes". Well, then you lose your liberty via jail or worse. Is that better than being arguably morally complicit? And, are you putting your actions where your words are? Are you not paying your taxes, or are you accepting blood on your hands?