> Neither Elm, nor any language in the Typed FP family, can do that. I didn't think so. So claims like: > In my experience, Elm code is only ever in a state o

> Neither Elm, nor any language in the Typed FP family, can do that. I didn't think so. So claims like: > In my experience, Elm code is only ever in a state of "horribly broken, won't compile" or "works". Which I find to be pretty common among fans of strongly typed functional languages, is incorrect.