5 ms·
> willing to sacrifice the ecosystem you get from open-source/widely adopted languages/frameworks for a marginal amount of convenience over something like Netli
by pbiggar 7y ago
> willing to sacrifice the ecosystem you get from open-source/widely adopted languages/frameworks for a marginal amount of convenience over something like Netlify
Obviously, no one is going to leave something that's good for something that's slightly better with a ton of downsides.
So either:
1) Dark is a lot better, like way way way better than what's come before, or
2) it's not, and no-one will use Dark.
We can probably agree that one of these two are true, right?
- karmakaze 7y agoNo single evaluation covers all users. We can see that the demand for software development is high and is especially high for backend. Anything that offers a safe, easy way to develop/deploy backends is a plus whether opensource or proprietary. Don't lock yourself into not getting locked as it goes.
- tluyben2 7y agoIf 1) is true people might still not use it unless open source. Unthinkable in the 90s, now all companies (big and small) I work with demand open source languages and frameworks, besides for embedded work.