4 ms·
Broadly agree BUT there are still advantages to copyrights on works that are still commercially viable. Seinfeld was made on film. Without copyright, someone
by derekdahmer 7y ago
Broadly agree BUT there are still advantages to copyrights on works that are still commercially viable. Seinfeld was made on film. Without copyright, someone would have to be incentivized to acquire the original reels and pay to digitally scan all 180 episodes of film, knowing that the resulting scans would also be in the public domain and thus very difficult to recoup their investment on.
So in an alternative reality where Seinfeld's copyright expired, its possible that SD TV captures of all the episodes would be free and publicly available (great!), but an HD conversion would never be made (not great).
- mprev 7y agoWould a new HD version have a new copyright date?
- shakna 7y agoNot normally. Film restoration isn't currently considered innovative enough for the output to be cobsidered a new work. However if you create new credits, titles, interstituals, etc. then it generally does qualify as a new work.