4 ms·
Honestly, that's totally cool. There's a certain risk profile that's right for where Dark is now (new startups, low risk projects, under-resourced projects/team
by pbiggar 7y ago
Honestly, that's totally cool. There's a certain risk profile that's right for where Dark is now (new startups, low risk projects, under-resourced projects/teams). Folks with a different risk profile should not be using Dark at the moment.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- eropple 7y agoRespectfully: why should you be considered a fair steward of trust for them, either? Those people shouldn't be using a startup-backed, no-accountability platform either.
- inimino 7y ago> a certain risk profile Sure: hobby projects and experiments. I would not include "under-resourced teams" or "new startups" in that, without many strong qualifiers attached.
- Etheryte 7y agoWhy would a new startup want to add another factor of uncertainty into building their product? If you want to prototype fast, you use whatever your technical side is comfortable with, you don't pick a new tool where you don't know how or even whether you can do your thing. Personally, the only real user segment I see for a proprietary language built by a startup is hobbyists and language enthusiasts.